<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET: &#8220;Fotoflexer is a really well put together app that could make a solid piece of standalone software. The fact that it’s free, and runs in your browser makes it even better.&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://blog.fotoflexer.com/2007/08/27/cnet-reviews-fotoflexer/</link>
	<description>News on the most advanced online image editor</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.fotoflexer.com/2007/08/27/cnet-reviews-fotoflexer/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.fotoflexer.com/2007/08/27/cnet-reviews-fotoflexer/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding , but it's just my opinion, which could be wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding , but it&#8217;s just my opinion, which could be wrong <img src='http://blog.fotoflexer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.fotoflexer.com/2007/08/27/cnet-reviews-fotoflexer/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.fotoflexer.com/2007/08/27/cnet-reviews-fotoflexer/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I couldn't understand some parts of this article , but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article , but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
